Compare and Contrast Servant Leadership and Followership.
The traditional style of leadership is “leader-follower”, where orders are given and expected to be obeyed. According to Marquet, the weakness in this model is that people who are treated as followers behave like followers, with expectations of limited authority and no true incentive to give their best.Skills you learn as a follower are applied when you become a leader. All leaders are followers, but not all followers are leaders. Therefore, the difference between leadership and followership is the process of learning and gaining the skills required to lead others. Followership, as its name suggests, is learning to be a follower.The thing is, sometimes being a follower is the right thing as long as you’ve chosen a good leader with sound morals, and good judgment who is capable of being a trustworthy leader. If you are a natural leader it’s good to sometimes let others shine as a leader when it is appropriate.
Leaders and Followers essays My parents always told me to be a leader, not a follower. They were basically telling me not follow other people into trouble. Everyone cannot be a leader but can be good followers for something, in a positive way. They cannot be leaders because they lack the skills.Leadership is the art of persuasion-the act of motivating people to do more than they ever thought possible in pursuit of a greater good. It has nothing to do with authority or seniority.
It is not better to be a leader than a follower because being a leader is a great pain. It's not about being a leader, it's about being who you are. A leader has to take up too much of the responsibility and if something goes wrong it is the leader who is blamed. So isn't it obvious that being a follower is far better than being a bossy leader.
